Crypto Council For Innovation
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Leadership
    • Membership
    • Careers
    • CCI News
    • Contact
    • Events
    • Press Releases
  • Analysis
    • All Analysis
    • Crypto in Action
    • News Analysis
    • Explainer
  • POSA
  • Comment Letters
  • Policy Briefs
  • Reports
  • Security
  • Financial Literacy
  • Policy
  • EU Elections
  • Crypto in Action
  • Explainer
    • Defi
    • NFTs
    • DAOs
    • Layer 1s
    • Layer 2s
    • Government
    • Infrastructure
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Leadership
    • Membership
    • Careers
    • CCI News
    • Contact
    • Events
    • Press Releases
  • Analysis
    • All Analysis
    • Crypto in Action
    • News Analysis
    • Explainer
  • POSA
  • Comment Letters
  • Policy Briefs
  • Reports
No Result
View All Result
Crypto Council For Innovation
No Result
View All Result

Home » Comment Letter: Bank of England Stablecoin Discussion Paper

Comment Letter: Bank of England Stablecoin Discussion Paper

byLaura Navaratnam
February 6, 2024
in Comment Letters
bank of england

FMID Payments Policy Team 

Bank of England 

20 Moorgate 

London 

EC2R 6DA 

Re: Regulatory regime for systemic payment systems using stablecoins and related service providers: discussion paper 

The Crypto Council for Innovation (“CCI”), a global alliance of industry leaders focussing on digital assets, appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback to the Bank of England (the “Bank”) on “Regulatory regime for systemic payment systems using stablecoins and related service providers: discussion paper” (the “Proposal”). 

CCI members span the crypto ecosystem and include some of the leading global companies and investors operating in the industry. CCI members share the goal of encouraging the responsible global regulation of crypto to unlock economic potential, improve lives, foster financial inclusion, protect security, and disrupt illicit activity. Achieving these goals requires informed, evidence-based policy decisions realised through collaborative engagement between regulators and industry. It also requires recognition of the transformative potential of crypto in improving and empowering the lives of global consumers. CCI and its members stand ready and willing to work with the Bank to accomplish these goals and ensure that the most transformative innovations of this generation and the next are best allowed to flourish around the world. 

CCI members support and encourage a UK cryptoasset regulatory approach which is robust, proportionate and stimulates innovation. Appropriate regulatory guardrails are crucial to ensure the continued growth of the UK ecosystem, and to realising the Government’s goal of further establishing the UK as a leading global cryptoasset hub. 

CCI supports a mixed UK payments ecosystem. We believe that in a mature market like the UK, subject to appropriate regulatory guard rails, there is a role for many different cryptographically-based payment methods, which include central bank issued currencies, privately issued stablecoins and potentially other forms of asset-backed cryptoassets. Privately issued stablecoins can bring about many benefits to UK customers, including enhanced inclusion and access, reduced transaction costs and faster settlement speeds. We are heartened by the statement in the opening foreword of the discussion paper which appears to broadly support our position, stating that “[s]etting out a framework within which this type of innovation can flourish in a sustainable way will ensure that the stability of the financial system is safeguarded and the provision of payments services upon which people depend is safe and reliable.” 

Further, CCI welcomes the Bank dedicating proper policy consideration to the important topic of systemic stablecoins, which we hope in due course will become a crucial facet in a thriving digital payments ecosystem in the UK. However, we are concerned that, when these proposals are taken in concert, it appears that a systemic stablecoin in the UK is both undesirable from a regulatory perspective and may struggle to be commercially viable, particularly when compared to other jurisdictions. CCI does not see how such an outcome can be beneficial to consumers, or indeed to the overarching objective of market stability. CCI encourages further holistic consideration of these proposals in light of the UK Government’s ambition to encourage competition and innovation, and to be a global cryptoasset hub. 

We also encourage the Bank to take account of the FCA’s stablecoin proposals; it is vital that the two regimes work seamlessly to achieve the same regulatory outcomes. Many stablecoins will grow to be systemic over time rather than being designated as such from launch. In practice, issuers would transition from FCA to the Bank rules and therefore that transition must be smooth and achievable. As the two regimes stand, we do not see how an issuercould practically make that shift, given the very different requirements of the two regimes, which effectively means a wholesale shift in commercial operations, and with little clarity as to when that cliff-edge of systemic designation would happen. 

Finally, CCI firmly believes that the UK’s ambitions on cryptoassets can be achieved without compromising the safety and soundness of our financial system, and without lowering protections for consumers. To that end, CCI is supportive of sound regulation which furthers responsible innovation and consumer protection. Against this backdrop, CCI provides our comments to the Proposal. 

Policy Brief: EU Commission Proposal on Payment Services Regulation

Backing and capital requirements 

In order for the stablecoin market to grow and prosper in the UK, investor confidence is crucial and this can only be delivered by ensuring an appropriate mix of backing assets which can sufficiently maintain the stability of the token in issuance. Further, maintaining reserve assets such that tokenholders can always redeem, irrespective of the circumstances, is also an important facet. As such CCI agrees with the underlying policy rationale behind these proposals. 

However, when considering the Bank’s proposals for backing and reserve assets together, we are concerned that the requirements are overly restrictive and not proportionate to the risks. 

If the Bank wishes to maintain backing assets 100% in central bank deposits, then we do not see the need for the proposed level of capital buffers. For example, we do not see the policy rationale for maintaining six (6) months of operating expenses or wind down costs given the 

additional shortfall reserves held in trust. Systemic stablecoin issuers would not be exposed to the same risks as banks, for example through fractional banking. With backing assets held fully with the central bank, the risks of a run on a stablecoin issuer is significantly less than with commercial banks; yet the policy proposals presented appear to judge there to be enhanced, not even an equal, degree of risk. In our view there is no need for the same level of capital buffers as with banks; this approach would be aligned with the principle of same risk, same regulatory outcome. 

Conversely, if the Bank wishes to maintain the proposed capital buffers, we believe it would be proportionate to permit a mix of central bank deposits and high quality liquid assets. For example, the FCA’s stablecoin proposals contemplate Government term market bonds, Certificates of Deposits (CDs), Commercial Papers (CPs), High Rating Corporate bonds and Repurchase Agreements (Repo’s) which we think should also be reviewed by the Bank for systemic stablecoin issuers. 

CCI notes the requirement for certain aspects of the systemic stablecoin payment chain to be subject to subsidiarisation requirements. We also note that the Bank goes on to say that backing assets and issuer’s capital would need to be held in the UK. We would welcome further clarity on the interplay between subsidiarisation and what appears to be ring fenced capital. For example, could the UK subsidiary rely on a guarantee from the parent company based elsewhere, particularly if subsidiarisation was only happening for the purposes of systemic stablecoin issuance (rather than the firm having pre-existing operations in the UK). 

CCI also welcomes additional clarity on the interplay between systemic stablecoin issuers/ custodians and systemic payment system operators. For example, how would the capital requirements apply if a non-systemic stablecoin were operating on a systemic payment system? Or does the Bank envisage that any stablecoin operating on such a system would itself have to be deemed systemic? 

Interest on deposits 

CCI notes the requirement that stablecoins must be backed with non-interest bearing central bank deposits, and that neither issuers nor customers can receive interest. This is a considerable shift from current market practices, and will require issuers to fundamentally rethink their commercial models. Our working assumption is therefore that the Bank expects systemic stablecoin issuers to charge transaction fees in the absence of interest payments. Such an approach would not be beneficial to customers, at a time where UK citizens need fast, affordable payment options more than ever. It is important for the UK to further promote innovation and competition by ensuring that consumers have access to various payment options, and that requires creating a level playing field for stablecoin issuers. We also note that one of the stated policy rationales behind this requirement is to disincentivize the use of stablecoins for investment. While we agree this may make holding stablecoins for long periods less likely, it would also disincentivize the use of stablecoins for payments generally, as the price of paying by this mechanism when compared to others would be increased. CCI encourages the Bank to contemplate alternative, less punitive measures which could similarly guard against the use of systemic stablecoins broadly as investments, without having a restrictive effect on customers, innovation and market competition. CCI would welcome the opportunity to be a further resource on this. 

UK Digital Assets Progress and Policy Roadmap

Holding limits 

CCI notes the proposal to introduce holding limits, at least during a transitional period. We understand the policy rationale behind this approach, and appreciate that these proposals are focussed on systemic stablecoins used within retail payments contexts, rather than for use in wholesale scenarios. 

However, we are concerned that the limits being proposed – i.e. mirroring the Digital Pound, are too low. In particular, the lower limit of £5,000 would severely restrict the use of a systemic stablecoin. Such low limits could easily be reached in a matter of weeks for individuals who frequently interact with stablecoins. It also limits the use cases – for example, it is likely that individuals who receive direct deposits would exceed these limits relatively quickly, making it unviable for those receiving income on a less frequent bases (e.g. monthly or quarterly) and potentially constrictive for those receiving frequent but lower values. CCI respectfully encourages the Bank to contemplate higher limits, to ensure a framework which encourages the use of systemic stablecoins in retail payment contexts. 

Further, while we appreciate that these proposals are still at an early stage, clarity on exactly how a limit will operate is crucial to ensure trust in the framework. CCI lists various examples for the Bank’s consideration: 

● How would holding limits be enforced – if the limit has been reached for a particular account, will payments simply not be transacted, similar to a lack of funds, or will the payment be made/received but a fine imposed, akin to a paid overdraft? 

● Who would be responsible for enforcing limits? 

● Would limits apply on an individual basis or on a per wallet basis? And how would these requirements interplay with individuals holding multiple wallets, potentially with different providers, for different purposes and containing different kinds of stablecoins and other regulated/unregulated cryptoassets? 

● Would limits be realtime, or an average across a day/month for example? 

Locational requirements 

The Bank proposes that issuers of systemic payment stablecoins should be set up in the UK as subsidiaries in order to carry out business and issuance activities into the UK and with UK-based consumers, both directly and through intermediaries. Given that, up until this point under the FCA regime, no such requirement exists, this would be a big organisational pivot at a relatively cliff edge point. 

Comment Letter: EBA’s 2nd Consultation

Requirements for Wallet Providers 

The Bank distinguishes between two types of wallets that coinholders can use to access their stablecoins – ‘custodial’ and ‘non-custodial’ or ‘unhosted’ wallets. The Bank further notes that it is exploring the risks associated with ‘non-custodial wallets’. 

However, CCI notes that the Bank has already identified ‘unhosted’ wallets as potential money laundering and terrorist financing tools that, in the view of the Bank, may hinder the ability of a stablecoin payment chain to deliver against the FPC’s expectations. As the Bank continues to investigate unhosted wallets – which we would encourage to be termed ‘self-hosted’ to more accurately reflect their material reality – CCI believes that the understanding of such wallets as currently stated is incorrect. 

Self-hosted wallets should be understood as technologically neutral – they are software or hardware solutions that enable users to safely, easily, and securely store the cryptographic keys required to unlock access to their digital assets. The choice to self-host is often not based on privacy or anonymity, but is in order to reduce the counterparty risk of centralised intermediaries, where users may lose access to their assets through no personal fault (for example, in the event of a financial crisis), and to provide direct control over the assets themselves. Indeed, it is the pseudoanonymity – not anonymity – of verifiable, public ledgers which enables agencies to trace transactions on public blockchains and identify illicit actors, whilst the implementation of global standards will lead to increased compliance with Anti-Money Laundering requirements. CCI notes that HMT clarified in its response last October, that the provision of self-hosted wallet technology would not, in itself, be captured by the new regulated activity of custody. 

Furthermore, as the Bank rightly points out, the UK travel rule and the related guidance from the JMLSG sets out the appropriate ways in which any residual risk from self-hosted wallets can be appropriately managed through a risk-based approach. Self-custody will form an important part of any future use case for payment stablecoins, allowing users to easily access and use their keys to enable payments, and CCI encourages the Bank to work closely with the industry to understand the full picture of self-hosted wallets. 

Definition of systemic 

CCI is concerned by the lack of clarity regarding what would be considered a systemic stablecoin. While we recognise that designation as systemic is a matter for HM Treasury under Part 5 of the Banking Act, we believe this does not preclude the Bank providing additional guidance. While some stablecoins could be systemic at launch, others could become systemic over time, meaning a clear regulatory threshold is needed as firms transition from FCA regulation, and the differing requirements of that regime, into the Bank’s systemic regime, which will likely require business model adjustments. 

In the absence of an objective, transparent threshold, private stablecoin issuers generally will be contemplating their presence in the UK market, for fear of triggering the systemic requirements. 

CCI again appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments and your consideration of our recommendations. We would welcome the opportunity to further engage on the comments detailed in this letter and ways to ensure the continued responsible growth of the cryptoasset industry in the UK. We look forward to the next steps in the policy process. 

Download the pdf version here.

Tags: bankbank of englandComment LettercryptoEconomyEUEuropePolicysuperUK
Tweet

Related Posts

EU
Comment Letters

European Data Protection Board (EDPB) Guidelines

July 1, 2025
Support Letter: Senate Passage of GENIUS Act
Comment Letters

Support Letter: Senate Passage of GENIUS Act

June 18, 2025
Load More
Next Post
12 Endeavour Square. FCA building

Comment Letter: FCA Stablecoin DP

By Categories

  • CCI News
  • Comment Letters
  • Congressional Testimony
  • Crypto in Action
  • Data
  • Explainers
  • Letter
  • News Analysis
  • Oped
  • Pinned Event
  • Policy Briefs
  • Press Releases
  • Previous Events
  • Recent Coverage
  • Report
  • Uncategorized
  • Upcoming Events
  • About
  • Contact

© 2025 Crypto Council For Innovation.

No Result
View All Result
Subscribe
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Leadership
    • Membership
    • Careers
    • CCI News
    • Contact
    • Events
    • Press Release
    • Recent Coverage
  • Analysis
    • All Analysis
    • Crypto in Action
    • Explainer
      • All Explainers
      • DeFi
      • NFT
      • DAO
      • Layer 1s
      • Layer 2s
      • Government
      • Infrastructure
    • News Analysis
  • Recent Coverage
  • Comment Letters
  • Policy Briefs
  • Reports
  • Security
  • Financial Literacy
  • Policy
  • EU Elections
  • In Action
  • Explainer
    • All Explainers
    • DeFi
    • NFT
    • DAO
    • Layer 1s
    • Layer 2s
    • Government
    • Infrastructure

© 2025 Crypto Council For Innovation.

Saskia Seidel

Policy Fellow

Saskia Seidel is the Policy Fellow at CCI, conducting legal and policy analysis on crypto regulations and legislative developments across key jurisdictions. She examines bills and regulatory proposals as well as case decisions, providing insights into the evolving landscape of digital assets policy.

Saskia holds a Master of Laws in International Business and Economic Law from Georgetown University Law Center. Originally from Germany, she earned a Bachelor's degree in Law and Economics and passed the First German State Exam in Law to qualify in the legal system.

Before joining CCI, Saskia worked at various law firms specializing in corporate and international tax law, where she developed a strong understanding of how businesses navigate legal and regulatory challenges in a cross-border context and advising on complex legal matters.

Krisina Antonio

Office Manager / Administrative Assistant

Krisina Antonio is the Executive Assistant to the CEO and DC Office Manager at CCI. Prior to joining CCI, Krisina has led executive offices in education and finance. She also worked within the pro-sports sales and marketing space for teams within the NFL, MLS, and Minor League Baseball

Emily Ekshian

Communications Specialist

Emily Ekshian is the Communications Lead at CCI, working closely with the communications team on branding, marketing and publicity efforts. She holds a Master of Science in Journalism from Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism, with concentrations in Finance, Technology, and Human Rights.

She also earned a Bachelor of Arts in Political Economy and Media Studies, with a Minor in Human Rights, from the University of California, Berkeley. Emily is passionate about the intersection of blockchain, digital assets, and global policy, focusing on how emerging technologies can support climate resilience, financial inclusion, and freedom of expression.

Through her work, she explores the transformative potential of Web3 in addressing global challenges and advancing positive social impact.

Renee Barton

Director, Impact Research

Renée leads Impact Research at CCI, documenting real world Web3 use cases to create shared understandings of how Web3 technologies are shaping the future for people and communities. She has ten years of experience examining the policy, economic, and community development implications of technology deployments.

She previously led primary ethnographic research at the Crypto Research and Design Lab (CRADL), where her research helped policymakers and business leaders understand why people are turning to crypto through evidenced-based insights.

Prior to her work at CRADL, Renée advised public, private, non-profit, and philanthropic clients at the intersection of technology, economic development and community-building.

Giles Swan

European Public Police Advisor

Giles has been a regulator, policymaker, the policy lead of a major digital asset service provider and the global policy director of a leading investment fund trade association. Giles advises trade associations, investment funds and asset managers, and web3 and crypto firms, on public policy, licensing, regulation and advocacy. During his time as a policymaker,

Giles was a national expert on the Investment Management Standing Committee of the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA), a national representative on the Standing Committee on Investment Management of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) and a member of the European Union’s Council of Ministers Financial Services Working Party.

Giles holds a BA in Banking and Finance, first class, from London Guildhall University, an MSc in Finance and Investment from CASS Business School and professional certificates in teaching and learning, and blockchain strategy.

Peter Herzog

Associate Director, State Government Affairs

Peter Herzog is a dedicated government affairs professional, specializing in issues impacting emerging financial technologies. As the Associate Director of State and Local Government Affairs at the Crypto Council for Innovation, Peter oversees initiatives to advance responsible regulation for the digital asset industry across state and local governments.

He has developed a pragmatic approach to building relationships with key decision makers and navigating nuanced policy issues. Before joining CCI, Peter served on the government relations team at the digital mortgage startup Better.com, where he led the organization’s state government relations strategy. He began his career at the Health and Medicine Counsel, a boutique healthcare lobbying firm on Capitol Hill,

where he was one of the youngest registered lobbyists in Washington, DC. His former clients include patient advocacy organizations, trade societies, and pharmaceutical companies. Peter holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Government and International Politics from George Mason University.

Ryan Eagan

Associate Director, Federal Affairs

With nearly 10 years of experience working for Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer, Ryan advised the Leader on a wide array of banking policies and housing priorities. He worked with members in the House and Senate and the relevant Committees to advance legislative priorities.

This includes federal responses to COVID such as the American Rescue Plan,statutory changes to securities law, ESG rulemaking, cryptocurrency policy, and certain appropriations topics.

He graduated Williams College with a BA in both Political Science and History.

Rashan Colbert

Director, U.S. Policy

Rashan A. Colbert is the US Policy Director for the Crypto Council for Innovation. A seasoned policy leader with extensive experience in government, politics, and the crypto industry, he has served as a senior legislative advisor in the U.S. Senate, led policy efforts for a cutting-edge DeFi protocol, and has amassed a high-powered network across the public and private sectors. As Head of Policy at dYdX Trading, Rashan took the firm’s advocacy strategy and effort from zero to one.

His work involved educating policymakers, advising company leadership on policy risks, and ensuring DeFi’s importance to the future of the United States was well understood in Washington. Before transitioning to the private sector, he spent seven years in Senator Cory Booker’s office, where he led on technology, telecommunications, and commerce issues, with work focused on AI, big tech, social media regulation, and digital assets.

As Booker’s lead staffer on crypto policy for the Senate Agriculture Committee, he developed a deep understanding of fi nancial regulation and the legislative vehicles that will be used to shape it.

Patrick Kirby

Policy Counsel

Patrick is joining CCI as Policy Counsel, and brings considerable experience engaging with policymakers on emerging technology and financial services issues. Before joining CCI, he worked as an attorney in the US Policy & Government Relations group at the law firms Dentons and Squire Patton Boggs.

In those roles, he advised domestic and international clients on a variety of legal, policy, and regulatory issues related to technology, financial services, and digital assets. He assisted clients in developing and executing government relations strategies to further their legislative and regulatory interests before Congress and the Executive Branch.

In prior roles, he served as a legal intern at the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

Yele Bademosi

Africa Advisor

Yele Bademosi is the co-creator of Onboard, a community-first onchain neobank designed for creators and builders. Onboard's goal is to expand the onchain economy, making it accessible to anyone, anywhere, and empowering people to live radically better lives.

Throughout his career, Yele has invested in close to 100 startups globally, primarily in the financial services and onchain sectors. His purpose extends beyond geographical borders, aiming to leverage innovation, capital, and policy to create sustainable economic opportunities worldwide.

Sean Lee

Senior APAC Advisor

Sean is an advisor and entrepreneur in Web3 and FinTech, and has been frequently quoted in Reuters, Forbes, Bloomberg, CoinDesk, among others. Sean was previously the CEO of the Algorand Foundation, an MIT incubated Layer-1 blockchain protocol that reached top-10 by network valuation during his tenure.

He is currently leading the efforts at VSFG, a global financial services platform and the first licensed virtual asset manager in Hong Kong, to develop the regulated HKD stablecoin for programmable payment and cross border use cases across Asia and beyond. Before entering into crypto and blockchain, Sean spent 10 years and held global leadership positions in cloud computing and open source software development companies.

Sean also advises crypto startups and engages in mentorship and advocacy programs including the MIT Entrepreneurship & FinTech Innovation Node, the Chinese University of Hong Kong Business School, and the Hong Kong FinTech Association.

Matt Homer

Senior Advisor

Matthew Homer is the Founder & General Partner of The Venture Dept. Previously, he was an investor at Nyca Partners, a $1B+ AUM fintech VC firm, where he remains involved as an Operating Partner in an advisory capacity.

Before venture investing, he was Executive Deputy Superintendent at the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), where he oversaw the licensing and supervision of major digital asset firms, including some of the largest exchanges, custodians, and stablecoin issuers in the U.S.

Earlier in his career, he worked as a federal regulator at the FDIC, focusing on policy development and new technologies. Matt has also held operating roles in fintech startups, starting at Quovo and continuing at Plaid after its acquisition.

Laura Navaratnam

UK Policy Lead

Laura is a digital assets policy expert, and serves as the UK Policy Lead for CCI. Laura is a fintech policy expert, specializing in digital assets. Laura has worked in financial services policy for over 15 years. She worked at the UK Financial Conduct Authority for 7 years where she ultimately served as the Head of the FCA’s Innovate function,

which included all aspects of cryptoasset policy and fintech (sandbox, firm support, international engagement and strategy). She is also a Director at bespoke fintech consultancy Gattaca Horizons, supporting a broad range of US and UK based fintech clients and leveraging her experience to provide policy, regulatory and strategy advice.

She is also a Non-Executive Director for Zero Hash UK, a leading crypto-as-a-service provider.

Cameron Jones

Director, Strategic Initiatives

Cameron has over 30 years of experience in technology, philanthropy, and civil society sectors. She worked in the nonprofit and private sectors in the U.S., Europe, and Asia.

She developed and scaled strategic social good programs for leading tech companies, including Amazon, Microsoft, Adobe, Intuit, and VMware, leading the development of program delivery and marketing strategies.

At CCI she leads strategic initiatives, manages new partnerships and current members.

Amanda Russo

Director, Communications

She led C-suite media relations and content for IHS Markit research divisions across Europe, the Middle East and Africa. As a strategic communications advisor to CEOs, heads of state, and policymakers, Amanda worked on the World Economic Forum’s Public Engagement leadership team as Head of Media Content. Amanda started her career as a terrorism and intelligence analyst.

Yaya J. Fanusie

Director, Policy, AML & Cyber Risk

He spent seven years as an economic and counterterrorism analyst in the CIA, briefing federal law enforcement, military personnel, White House-level policy makers and the President. After government service, he joined the think tank world and as Director of Analysis at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ Center on Sanctions and Illicit Finance led research on sanctions evasion and terrorist financing threats.

In 2016 he began tracking the illicit use of crypto and wrote some of the first public analysis on a terrorist crypto crowdfunding campaign. He later published a major study on efforts by Russia, Iran, Venezuela, and China to build national blockchain infrastructure. Yaya is currently an Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) and Visiting Fellow at Georgetown's Psaros Center for Financial Markets and Policy.

He is a frequent media commentator and has testified before Congress multiple times on illicit financing issues. He is considered a leading expert on China’s CBDC.

Annie Dizon

Chief Operating Officer

With more than 20 years of tech, operations, and marketing experience, Annie has held several senior executive positions at the global social impact nonprofit TechSoup; most recently serving as Vice President of Customer Experience. Prior to TechSoup, she led marketing communications programs for leading Fortune 500 companies in the financial and professional services sectors.

Ji Kim

President and Acting Chief Executive Officer

Ji Kim is the President and Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Crypto Council for Innovation - the premier global alliance for advancing the promise of this new technology through research, education and advocacy. Prior to this role, he served as the Chief Legal & Policy Officer for CCI. Before joining CCI, he was General Counsel and Head of Policy & Regulatory Affairs at Gemini, a global digital asset exchange and custodian.

In his role, Ji led the legal, policy, and regulatory affairs teams and also set and implemented Gemini’s global strategy for engaging with regulators, policymakers, and the government. Prior to that, he was a senior attorney at Kraken, another global digital asset exchange. In prior roles, he was an attorney at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP and served as Federal Judicial Law Clerk to the Honorable Robert D. Drain of the Southern District of New York, U.S. Bankruptcy Court.

Sheila Warren

Senior Global Policy Advisor

In 2023, Sheila was voted one of the most influential women in DC by the Washingtonian. Prior to the Crypto Council, she founded the World Economic Forum’s blockchain and digital assets team and was a member of the Executive Leadership Team. She oversaw tech policy strategy across 14 countries and regularly briefed ministers, CEOs of the Fortune 100 and Heads of State.

She spent significant time as a lawyer and executive in the nonprofit sector helping companies work with emerging technology to solve problems and increase efficiency. She was on the leadership team at TechSoup and built NGOsource, an online service that helps US foundations reduce costs on cross-border grants.

Sheila began her career as a Wall Street attorney at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP after earning her J.D. at Harvard Law School. She graduated magna cum laude from Harvard College with a degree in Economics. She is the co-host of Money Reimagined, a CoinDesk podcast.

Senator Cory Gardner

Senior Political Advisor

Senator Gardner honorably represented the state of Colorado from 2015 to 2021 after two terms in the United States House of Representatives. During his tenure, Cory was consistently recognized as one of the most bi-partisan members of the Senate, sponsoring and passing milestone legislation like the Great American Outdoors Act,

America COMPETES Act, the Asia Reassurance Initiative Act and the 988 Suicide Prevention Hotline. He served on the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Mark Foster

EU Policy Lead

Mark has over 20 years of experience advising public and private sector entities on EU policy and politics. He started his career in Brussels as a European Parliamentary Assistant from 2003 to 2007. He later developed expertise in EU financial services as a Senior Official in the UK Permanent Representation.

In 2011, he moved to Kreab, a global public affairs and consultancy firm, where he became Partner in the financial services practice. He has held elected roles in trade associations including vice-chair at the financial services committee of AmCham EU and he retains a role as vice-chair for the EU/UK task force at the British Chamber of Commerce to the EU.

Mark was VP of Government Relations at Barclays from 2019-2021 before establishing his own business – Strategic Advisory Management - at the start of 2022.

Alison Mangiero

Senior Director, Staking Coalition & Industry Affairs

Alison Mangiero is the Executive Director of Proof of Stake Alliance (POSA), a CCI project that advocates for clear and forward-thinking public policies that foster innovation in the rapidly growing, sustainable, multi-billion dollar staking industry.

Alison began working in the industry in 2018, when she founded the Tocqueville Group (“TQ”), an entity that created open-source software and other public goods for Tezos, one of the first proof-of-stake blockchains to launch. Before founding TQ, she spent a decade in public policy and academia, and has broad experience fundraising and growing membership associations.

A passionate advocate of the liberal arts, Alison also teaches courses on leadership at the College of the Holy Cross and is on the Executive Board of Advisors for the University of Richmond's Jepson School of Leadership Studies.An alum of the University of Richmond and Boston College, Alison lives in the New York City suburbs with her husband and two young daughters.